| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2010-09-09 12:54 CEST |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Docs |
| Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||
| ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||
| 0005079 | [JEDI VCL] 00 JVCL Components | minor | have not tried | 2009-12-28 19:59 | 2009-12-31 11:43 | ||
| Reporter | Robert Rossmair | View Status | public | ||||
| Assigned To | obones | ||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | fixed | ||||
| Status | resolved | Product Version | Daily / SVN | ||||
| Summary | 0005079: TJvRas32 limited to 50 phone book entries | ||||||
| Description |
see TJvRas32.RefreshPhoneBook. It not only provides a buffer for a maximum of 50 entries, but silently "deals" with API function RasEnumEntries returning ERROR_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL by throwing away all entries above 0000050 (which IMO is not a prudent thing to do). Note that I am not affected; I only stumbled over this problem being discussed in a forum I visited: http://entwickler-forum.de/showthread.php?t=56871. [^] |
||||||
| Additional Information | |||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
 Relationships |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
(0017040) obones (administrator) 2009-12-29 09:54 |
Please provide the zipped sources of a sample application showing this |
|
(0017043) AHUser (developer) 2009-12-29 10:19 |
@obones: Could be complicated unless you have installed more than 50 RAS connections. The limit is hard coded "array [1..50] of...". |
|
(0017052) Robert Rossmair (administrator) 2009-12-30 21:11 |
Olivier, I am reporting this as a fellow JEDI developer who noticed an obvious problem with the code. I don't use this code; if I was interested enough to create a sample app, I could have provided a fix as well. |
|
(0017053) obones (administrator) 2009-12-30 21:45 |
Hum, yes, you're right, I was in "quick sort" mode when I answered this issue. And with the comment from Andreas, it's quite obvious now. |
|
(0017055) obones (administrator) 2009-12-31 11:43 |
This is now solved in SVN |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2009-12-28 19:59 | Robert Rossmair | New Issue | |
| 2009-12-29 09:54 | obones | Note Added: 0017040 | |
| 2009-12-29 09:54 | obones | Status | new => feedback |
| 2009-12-29 10:19 | AHUser | Note Added: 0017043 | |
| 2009-12-30 21:11 | Robert Rossmair | Note Added: 0017052 | |
| 2009-12-30 21:45 | obones | Note Added: 0017053 | |
| 2009-12-30 21:45 | obones | Status | feedback => confirmed |
| 2009-12-31 11:43 | obones | Note Added: 0017055 | |
| 2009-12-31 11:43 | obones | Status | confirmed => resolved |
| 2009-12-31 11:43 | obones | Fixed in Version | => Daily / SVN |
| 2009-12-31 11:43 | obones | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2009-12-31 11:43 | obones | Assigned To | => obones |
| Mantis 1.1.6[^] Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group |  |
