Project JEDI - Issue Tracker
Mantis Bugtracker

Viewing Issue Simple Details Jump to Notes ] View Advanced ] Issue History ] Print ]
ID Category Severity Reproducibility Date Submitted Last Update
0006480 [JEDI VCL] 00 JVCL Components crash have not tried 2015-12-10 21:45 2016-08-23 00:23
Reporter Kyle_Katarn View Status public  
Assigned To AHUser
Priority normal Resolution fixed  
Status resolved   Product Version 3.48
Summary 0006480: Error: Runtime error 217 at 011789DA
Description Following the following upgrade, one of my user get a Error: Runtime error 217 at 011789DA

JCL v2.4 -> v2.7
JVCL v3.39 -> v3.49

Cause confirmed : JxCL incompatible with Embedded edition of windows 8

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/sumo-keep-your-software-up-to-date.314623/page-60#post-2547752 [^]
Additional Information Duplicate from http://issuetracker.delphi-jedi.org/view.php?id=6477 [^] as i don't know if it is JCL or JVCL that crashes.
Tags No tags attached.
Attached Files

- Relationships
has duplicate 0006477resolvedAHUser JEDI Code Library Error: Runtime error 217 at 011789DA 

-  Notes
(0021262)
Kyle_Katarn (reporter)
2015-12-20 11:13

up !
(0021273)
Kyle_Katarn (reporter)
2016-03-23 20:49

Any chance to get this fixed or analysed ?
(0021290)
Kyle_Katarn (reporter)
2016-05-23 20:56

Another occurence here : http://www.nsaneforums.com/topic/269294-sumo-4314317/?do=findComment&comment=1092498 [^]
(0021319)
AHUser (developer)
2016-08-03 21:29

It may be related to Mantis 0006489
http://issuetracker.delphi-jedi.org/view.php?id=6489 [^]

The code that is mentioned in 0006489 is only executed for Windows 8 and if a registry key doesn't exist or is not a valid integer.


Otherwise, there is not much the JCL/JVCL team can do here.
(0021320)
Kyle_Katarn (reporter)
2016-08-03 22:04

Looks like you're right !
When is this supposed to be integrated in an official release so that i can test ?
(0021322)
AHUser (developer)
2016-08-04 13:26

Official versions are usually only released if there is a new Delphi version. And with EMBT switching back to a yearly release cycle, you may be better of using a daily snapshot, or merge the JclSysInfo changes into your code base by hand.
(0021323)
Kyle_Katarn (reporter)
2016-08-04 14:01

So I can mix daily JCL / JVCL without expecting issues ?
(0021324)
AHUser (developer)
2016-08-04 16:57

The daily versions of JCL and JVCL shouldn't be too far away, but because the development speed is very slow at the moment there shouldn't be any incompatibilities between the two. But daily builds may be contain bugs if somebody is working on it and nobody tested the code yet.
(0021327)
Kyle_Katarn (reporter)
2016-08-04 19:24

I've compiled SUMo again with these new daily build
Now waiting for user feedback :
http://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/sumo-keep-your-software-up-to-date.314623/page-68#post-2607369 [^]
http://www.nsaneforums.com/topic/269294-sumo-4314317/?do=findComment&comment=1119139 [^]
(0021348)
AHUser (developer)
2016-08-06 12:41

What daily build did you use? The one made before I fixed the bug or did you use the git master branch?
(0021371)
Kyle_Katarn (reporter)
2016-08-07 16:55

I'm using the one with
Result := StrToIntDef(Copy(Ver, 1, Pos('.', Ver) - 1), 2); // don't use StrBefore because it uses StrCaseMap that may not be initialized yet

Is that correct ?
Does anybody uses Win8.1 Embedded and could try my test build in order to confirm that this was the cause of the problem ?
(0021375)
AHUser (developer)
2016-08-07 19:10

That the correct one.

Nobody uses Win 8.1 Embedded, especially not at home.
(0021376)
Kyle_Katarn (reporter)
2016-08-07 23:12

OK good news.

Regarding Win 8.1 Embedded @ Home, that also what i thought until 2 users reported the Error 217 regression :-(
(0021377)
Kyle_Katarn (reporter)
2016-08-07 23:12

I'd suggest to close this issue + duplicates and i'll reopen a new ticket if still reported by users.
(0021378)
Kyle_Katarn (reporter)
2016-08-09 23:30

@AHUser are you OK with my proposal ?

I've found one user with Windows Embedded. He should give me more feedback on the fix in a few days.
(0021382)
Kyle_Katarn (reporter)
2016-08-22 16:24

No feedback from user so far. I propose to close this one and i'll reopen a new ticket if still reported by users.

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2015-12-10 21:45 Kyle_Katarn New Issue
2015-12-20 11:13 Kyle_Katarn Note Added: 0021262
2016-03-23 20:49 Kyle_Katarn Note Added: 0021273
2016-05-23 20:56 Kyle_Katarn Note Added: 0021290
2016-08-03 21:29 AHUser Note Added: 0021319
2016-08-03 21:29 AHUser Status new => feedback
2016-08-03 22:04 Kyle_Katarn Note Added: 0021320
2016-08-04 13:26 AHUser Note Added: 0021322
2016-08-04 14:01 Kyle_Katarn Note Added: 0021323
2016-08-04 16:57 AHUser Note Added: 0021324
2016-08-04 19:24 Kyle_Katarn Note Added: 0021327
2016-08-06 12:39 AHUser Relationship added has duplicate 0006477
2016-08-06 12:41 AHUser Note Added: 0021348
2016-08-07 16:55 Kyle_Katarn Note Added: 0021371
2016-08-07 19:10 AHUser Note Added: 0021375
2016-08-07 23:12 Kyle_Katarn Note Added: 0021376
2016-08-07 23:12 Kyle_Katarn Note Added: 0021377
2016-08-09 23:30 Kyle_Katarn Note Added: 0021378
2016-08-22 16:24 Kyle_Katarn Note Added: 0021382
2016-08-23 00:23 AHUser Status feedback => resolved
2016-08-23 00:23 AHUser Fixed in Version => Daily / GIT
2016-08-23 00:23 AHUser Resolution open => fixed
2016-08-23 00:23 AHUser Assigned To => AHUser


Mantis 1.1.6[^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker