View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002686 | JEDI VCL | 00 JVCL Components | public | 2005-02-25 07:43 | 2006-06-27 03:41 |
| Reporter | anonymous | Assigned To | obones | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Product Version | 3.00 BETA 2 | ||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | 3.30 | |||
| Summary | 0002686: TJvDBDateTimePicker broken in V3 | ||||
| Description | - DropDownDate not working - Exception opening DBDateTimePicker and closing without selecting a date Alle bugs are related to jvdatetimepicker.pas and not jvdbdatetimerpicker.pas. Everything works fine in JVCL V2. | ||||
| Additional Information | Workaround: procedure TJvDateTimePicker.CNNotify(var Msg: TWMNotify): 1. Delete the case-handlers NM_SETFOCUS and NM_KILLFOCUS (this repairs the dropdowndate issue because NullText ist set to '') 2. There is a message with code (MCN_LAST + 6) which may not be handled by inherited. Example: (MCN_LAST + 6): begin // ##has to be ignored end; I don't know why. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| related to | 0001922 | resolved | remkobonte | Suggestions for TJvDateTimePicker and TJvDBDateTimePicker |
|
2005-02-25 07:43
|
jedibug_1.zip (3,743 bytes) |
|
|
MCN_LAST + 6 == DTN_CLOSEUP |
|
|
What should be displayed in the TJvDateTimePicker control, when it is focused and Date equals NullDate? |
|
|
NullText I have verified that the proposed fix works, so I am planning to check it in. Any objections? |
|
|
Not really, but user tlsi2000 says in mantis 0001922 that the text of the TJvDateTimePicker control should not change to NullText while editing, so the NullDate functionality should be disabled while the control has focus. This conficts with what anonymous proposes here, hence my question what should be displayed in the TJvDateTimePicker control, when it is focused and Date equals NullDate.. I can't reproduce the exception BTW. |
|
|
Hm, could this be an OS issue? I get the AV here on W2k... |
|
|
For this bug just override function CheckNullValue which needs to be virtual. So implement this code which consideers the Field as unexistent or Null : function TJvDBDateTimePicker.CheckNullValue: Boolean; begin Result := not assigned ( FDataLink.Field ) or FDataLink.Field.IsNull or CheckNullValue(NullText, Format, Kind, DateTime, NullDate) ; end; |
|
|
anyone care to comment ? |
|
|
hello? |
|
|
Well, without any response, I'm assuming this is fixed in the latest development version. Should it not be the case, please provide a sample application and/or a diff file against the latest SVN content: http://homepages.borland.com/jedi/wiki/index.php?title=Repository |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-02-25 07:43 | anonymous | New Issue | |
| 2005-02-25 07:43 | anonymous | File Added: jedibug_1.zip | |
| 2005-02-26 02:32 |
|
Note Added: 0006592 | |
| 2005-02-26 10:26 | remkobonte | Relationship added | related to 0001922 |
| 2005-02-27 07:45 | remkobonte | Note Added: 0006602 | |
| 2005-02-27 07:45 | remkobonte | Status | new => feedback |
| 2005-02-27 10:57 | remkobonte | Note Edited: 0006602 | |
| 2005-03-10 14:22 |
|
Note Added: 0006677 | |
| 2005-03-10 15:13 | remkobonte | Note Added: 0006681 | |
| 2005-03-10 15:36 |
|
Note Added: 0006682 | |
| 2005-04-25 06:23 | anonymous | Note Added: 0007064 | |
| 2005-08-09 07:02 | obones | Note Added: 0007727 | |
| 2006-03-31 07:24 | obones | Note Added: 0008807 | |
| 2006-06-27 03:41 | obones | Status | feedback => resolved |
| 2006-06-27 03:41 | obones | Fixed in Version | => Daily / SVN |
| 2006-06-27 03:41 | obones | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2006-06-27 03:41 | obones | Assigned To | => obones |
| 2006-06-27 03:41 | obones | Note Added: 0009663 |
