|Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account||2018-12-12 00:50 CET|
|Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Docs|
|Viewing Issue Simple Details|
|ID||Category||Severity||Reproducibility||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0002314||[JEDI VCL] 00 JVCL Components||minor||always||2004-11-12 15:55||2006-06-08 02:44|
|Status||resolved||Product Version||3.00 BETA 2|
|Summary||0002314: JvInspector paints incorrectly when UseBands = True|
When the UseBands property is True, TJvInspector does not draw the property names or buttons for items in the second band. (You can see this by running the InspectorSimpleExample after changing the UseBands property to True). I believe the problem is in TJvInspectorBorlandNETBasePainter.SetupRects: the various uses of Inspector.DividerAbs should really be using ItemRect2.Left+Inspector.DividerAbs, since, in bands after the first, ItemRect2.Left > 0 (it is the left boundary of the band).
It would probably be worthwhile to cache the value of ItemRect2.Left+Inspector.DividerAbs in a local for the routine, rather than recalculating it several times.
|Tags||No tags attached.|
Here's a couple of other cosmetic problems.
1) If you use a font which produces a text height > 16, inspectors don't draw correctly (the rows are too short, so the text is cut off). I think TJvInspector should override FontChanged and update its ItemHeight based on the height of the current font.
2) TJvInspectorBooleanItem: when using larger ItemHeights, the checkboxes are drawn too high in the value area. I think TJvInspectorBooleanItem.DrawValue should either increase the size of the checkboxes (based on the height ov the value area) or vertically center the checkboxes in the value area.
Hmm, who changed that code? I'm positive that worked in the version I released, but lots of changes have been made at a later point (either to improve the performance, or add new features.
To the author of the anonymous note: please create separate bug reports; these two things have nothing to do with this bug.
|Does this still happen in the latest version?|
Well, no answers, I'm assuming this is fixed in the latest daily version:
|2004-11-12 15:55||glchapman||New Issue|
|2004-12-01 12:37||anonymous||Note Added: 0005801|
|2005-09-17 13:18||marcelb||Note Added: 0007942|
|2006-04-03 05:59||obones||Note Added: 0008839|
|2006-04-03 05:59||obones||Status||new => feedback|
|2006-06-08 02:44||obones||Status||feedback => resolved|
|2006-06-08 02:44||obones||Resolution||open => fixed|
|2006-06-08 02:44||obones||Assigned To||=> obones|
|2006-06-08 02:44||obones||Note Added: 0009436|
|Mantis 1.1.6[^] Copyright © 2000 - 2008 Mantis Group|